From 389dedd3c0e85f6be3c547c9e492691502d0ad36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julia McGeoghan <jkmcgeoghan@myseneca.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:35:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #421 - Add test for fs.promises.link to ensure it returns
 a Promise (#462)

* Add test

* Move location of describe block

* Remove comment

* Have test check returnValue and not obj

* Override package-lock.json with one from master branch

* Improve naming of fsPromise variable to be more clear
---
 tests/spec/fs.link.spec.js | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/spec/fs.link.spec.js b/tests/spec/fs.link.spec.js
index 0466ae4..ac74ee7 100644
--- a/tests/spec/fs.link.spec.js
+++ b/tests/spec/fs.link.spec.js
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ describe('fs.link', function() {
 
           fs.lstat('/myfileLink', function (error, result) {
             if (error) throw error;
-            
             var _linkstats = result;
             fs.lstat('/myotherfile', function (error, result) {
               expect(error).not.to.exist;
@@ -110,4 +109,18 @@ describe('fs.link', function() {
       });
     });
   });
+
+});
+
+describe('fs.promises.link', function() {
+
+  beforeEach(util.setup);
+  afterEach(util.cleanup);
+
+  it('should return a promise', function() {
+    var fsPromise = util.fs().promises;
+    var returnValue = fsPromise.link('/myfile', '/myotherfile');
+    expect(returnValue).to.be.a('promise');
+  });
+
 });