diff --git a/src/functional.ts b/src/functional.ts
index aac05ca..e59d0b4 100644
--- a/src/functional.ts
+++ b/src/functional.ts
@@ -108,8 +108,12 @@ export function functionalInterfaceFactory({
 
   /**
    * Verifies multiple signatures at once returning true if all valid or false
-   * if at least one is not. Optimized method when knowing which signature is
-   * wrong is not relevant, i.e. verifying an Eth2.0 block.
+   * if at least one is not. Optimization useful when knowing which signature is
+   * wrong is not relevant, i.e. verifying an entire Eth2.0 block.
+   *
+   * This method provides a safe way to do so by multiplying each signature by
+   * a random number so an attacker cannot craft a malicious signature that won't
+   * verify on its own but will if it's added to a specific predictable signature
    * https://ethresear.ch/t/fast-verification-of-multiple-bls-signatures/5407
    */
   function verifyMultipleSignatures(
diff --git a/test/unit/index.test.ts b/test/unit/index.test.ts
index cf50d4a..627919f 100644
--- a/test/unit/index.test.ts
+++ b/test/unit/index.test.ts
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 import {expect} from "chai";
 import {IBls} from "../../src/interface";
 import {getN, randomMessage} from "../util";
+import {hexToBytes} from "../../src/helpers";
 
 export function runIndexTests(bls: IBls): void {
   // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type
@@ -90,4 +91,85 @@ export function runIndexTests(bls: IBls): void {
       expect(isValid).to.be.false;
     });
   });
+
+  describe("verifyMultipleSignatures", () => {
+    it("Should verify multiple signatures", () => {
+      const n = 4;
+      const dataArr = getN(n, () => {
+        const sk = bls.SecretKey.fromKeygen();
+        const pk = sk.toPublicKey();
+        const msg = randomMessage();
+        const sig = sk.sign(msg);
+        return {pk, msg, sig};
+      });
+      const pks = dataArr.map((data) => data.pk);
+      const msgs = dataArr.map((data) => data.msg);
+      const sigs = dataArr.map((data) => data.sig);
+
+      expect(
+        bls.verifyMultipleSignatures(
+          pks.map((pk) => pk.toBytes()),
+          msgs,
+          sigs.map((sig) => sig.toBytes())
+        )
+      ).to.equal(true, "functional (bytes serialized) interface failed");
+
+      expect(bls.Signature.verifyMultipleSignatures(pks, msgs, sigs)).to.equal(true, "class interface failed");
+    });
+
+    it("Test fails correctly against a malicous signature", async () => {
+      // Data computed with lower level BLS primitives
+      // https://github.com/dapplion/eth2-bls-wasm/blob/2d2f3e6a0487e96706bfd8a1b8039c7d6c79f71f/verifyMultipleSignatures.test.js#L40
+      // It creates N valid signatures
+      // It messes with the last 2 signatures, modifying their values
+      // such that they wqould not fail in aggregate signature verification.
+      // Creates a random G2 point with is added to the last signature
+      // and substracted to the second to last signature
+      const maliciousSignatureTestData = {
+        pks: [
+          "b836ccf44fa01e46745ccc3a47855e959783ef5df5cdcc607354b98d52c16b6613761339bfb833fd525cdca7c8071c6b",
+          "a317ce36dcf2bf6fd262dbad80427f890bc166152682cb6c600a66eb7d525f200839ab798ca4877c3143a31201905de4",
+          "b9b7b4f4a88d98f34b4c9ba8ae10e935ba51164ddc045d6ae26b403c87a6934e6c75f9fb5cc4b3b29a1255b316d08de5",
+          "a386a2bc7e9d13cf9b4ad3c819547534c768aeae6a2414bfcebee50f38aaf85a9d610974db931278c08fe86a91eb2999",
+        ],
+        msgs: [
+          "690a91fc0a7a49bbc5afe9516c1831ca8845f281ef2e414f7dfeb71b5e91a902",
+          "3829d4fc2332afc2634079823b89598f3674be5da324b1092b3d8aeb7af5e164",
+          "9a9406647ed6af16b5ce3e828c5f5ef35f1221ed10476209476c12776ce417ac",
+          "3e8e4bcb78fda59a43ebfb90970cc6036ce18dc3d3a1b714cc4c1bfc00b8258e",
+        ],
+        sigs: [
+          "864ed65f224cf4e49e9bbf313d3dc243649885d9bd432a15e6c1259f2e4c29fcefa7a4c3aafaac01519f7c92239702d7096df2971b1801cd26d0ca0d5e7743ccb0abe79d8c383f9bb04ebe553a3094e84d55bc79be7eff5ffdb9b322205acfd1",
+          "90efd8c82c356956fc170bec2aed874d14cea079625dfe69d8bc375e10fcd96e2c0348dfeb713f1889629ccb9ec95fee0e0c9cc7a728d8a7068701a04192ed585ec761edf6e2c1e44ceaaa61732052af81a6033fa7d375d7f7157909549322da",
+          "9023f43cc8e05a3e842b242b9f6781a9e2eadbfcbebd1242563e56bb47cd273ef20fc0c5099e05e83093581907bfd02915b5ef8c553918d4524c274a8856950c87c6314a2c003a2ed28e5fb56ddfdb233a2b895c2397bd15629325d95ca43b83",
+          "82c8fedc6ad43e945bbf7529d55b73d7ce593bc9ea94dfaf91d720b2ab0e51ce551f7fcda96d428b627ff776c94d6f360af425fe7fb4e4469b893071149db747f27a8bd488af7ba7f0edf86c7e551af89d7a55d4fc86968e10f91ed76e68e373",
+        ],
+        manipulated: [false, false, true, true],
+      };
+
+      const pks = maliciousSignatureTestData.pks.map(hexToBytes);
+      const msgs = maliciousSignatureTestData.msgs.map(hexToBytes);
+      const sigs = maliciousSignatureTestData.sigs.map(hexToBytes);
+
+      maliciousSignatureTestData.manipulated.forEach((isManipulated, i) => {
+        expect(bls.verify(pks[i], msgs[i], sigs[i])).to.equal(
+          !isManipulated,
+          isManipulated ? "Manipulated signature should not verify" : "Ok signature should verify"
+        );
+      });
+
+      // This method (AggregateVerify in BLS spec lingo) should verify
+      const dangerousAggSig = bls.aggregateSignatures(sigs);
+      expect(bls.verifyMultiple(pks, msgs, dangerousAggSig)).to.equal(
+        true,
+        "Malicious signature should be validated with bls.verifyMultiple"
+      );
+
+      // This method is expected to catch the malicious signature and not verify
+      expect(bls.verifyMultipleSignatures(pks, msgs, sigs)).to.equal(
+        false,
+        "Malicous signature should not validate with bls.verifyMultipleSignatures"
+      );
+    });
+  });
 }